Marketplace  
Buy domain name registration including free domain forwardings
Affordable webhosting : cheap web hosting service for single and multiple domain names
Cheap domain registration and domain transfer

 Home Prev Up NextDocBook: The Definitive Guide 2.0.10 (Alpha)

abstract

$Revision: 1.3 $

$Date: 2002/06/12 11:17:57 $

abstract — A summary

Synopsis

Content Model

abstract ::=
(title?,
 (formalpara|para|simpara)+)

Attributes

Common attributes

Description

An abstract can occur in most components of DocBook. It is expected to contain some sort of summary of the content with which it is associated (by containment).

Processing expectations

Formatted as a displayed block. Sometimes suppressed. Often presented in alternate outputs.

Parents

These elements contain abstract: appendix, appendixinfo, article, articleinfo, bibliodiv, biblioentry, bibliography, bibliographyinfo, bibliomixed, bibliomset, biblioset, blockinfo, blockquote, bookinfo, callout, chapter, chapterinfo, glossary, glossaryinfo, glossdiv, index, indexinfo, itemizedlist, listitem, msgexplan, msgtext, objectinfo, orderedlist, partinfo, partintro, preface, prefaceinfo, procedure, refentryinfo, referenceinfo, refsect1, refsect1info, refsect2, refsect2info, refsect3, refsect3info, refsection, refsectioninfo, refsynopsisdiv, refsynopsisdivinfo, sect1, sect1info, sect2, sect2info, sect3, sect3info, sect4, sect4info, sect5, sect5info, section, sectioninfo, setindex, setindexinfo, setinfo, sidebarinfo, simplesect, step, taskprerequisites, taskrelated, tasksummary, variablelist.

Children

The following elements occur in abstract: formalpara, para, simpara, title.

Examples

<!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.1.2//EN"
          "http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.1.2/docbookx.dtd">
<chapter><title>Some Chapter</title>
<abstract>
<para>
In brief, &hellip;
</para>
</abstract>
<para>
In this chapter, &hellip;
</para>
</chapter>

For additional examples, see also section.

Prev  Home Next
abbrev  Up accel


 

  

Marketplace:
 
" PC Magazine tested file server performance again in April 2002; Linux with Samba beat Windows 2000 again, but Samba then surpassed Windows 2000 by about 100% and can handle 4 times as many clients.   "